Open Access Explained: Gold, Green, Diamond & Hybrid — A Guide for African Researchers

Researcher Guide · Open Access

“Open access” is not one thing. It is a family of models — gold, green, diamond and hybrid — and they differ in who pays, where your paper lives, and what you are allowed to reuse. Getting the difference right is the difference between publishing for free and being asked for a fee larger than a Nigerian lecturer’s monthly salary. Here is each model, plainly, with the routes that cost an African researcher nothing.
By the FRELIP Editorial Team · Open Access & Research Practice · Checked against the Budapest Open Access Initiative, DOAJ, UNESCO & the OA Diamond Journals Study, 2026
4
core models: gold · green · diamond · hybrid
~2 in 3
DOAJ journals charge authors no fee
₦0
what green & diamond cost the author
$0–$12k+
the range of article fees across models
What this guide covers
  1. What “open access” actually means
  2. The four models at a glance
  3. Gold, green, diamond & hybrid — one by one
  4. Bronze, and what is not open access
  5. What it really costs — APCs & waivers
  6. Choosing your route as a Nigerian researcher
  7. Identifiers, discovery & how FRELIP helps
  8. FRELIP fact-check report
  9. Sources

What “open access” actually means

Open access (OA) means research that is free to read online, with no subscription and no paywall between the reader and the work. The founding definition comes from the Budapest Open Access Initiative of 2002, which described OA as literature made “freely available on the public internet, permitting any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts.” That is the goal every model below is trying to reach — they simply take different roads to it, and split the cost differently along the way.

Two distinctions unlock everything that follows. The first is about rights. Scholars separate gratis OA — free to read, but with normal copyright still restricting reuse — from libre OA — free to read and carrying an open licence (usually a Creative Commons licence such as CC BY) that also permits reuse, translation and text-mining. Libre is the fuller form of open access.

The second distinction is about where the open copy lives, and it gives us the two original “roads” named by cognitive scientist Stevan Harnad: the gold road, where the journal itself publishes the article openly, and the green road, where the author deposits a copy in a repository. Everything marketers now call “gold, green, diamond, hybrid” is a refinement of those two ideas plus one question: who pays, and how much?

The four models at a glance

Before the detail, here is the whole landscape on one screen. Read it as: where is the open copy, who pays, and what does it cost me as the author?

ModelWhere the open copy livesWho paysCost to you, the author
GoldThe journal — final published version, open immediatelyUsually the author/their funder, via an APCOften an APC (but not always — see diamond)
GreenA repository — your own accepted manuscriptNo one charges the authorFree. The journal may still be paywalled
DiamondThe journal — final version, open immediatelyAn institution, society or grantFree to read and free to publish
HybridA subscription journal, one article at a timeThe author, on top of the journal’s subscriptionsAn APC — usually the most expensive route
The single most useful thing to remember

The colour is not the price. “Gold” does not mean “you pay” and “green” does not mean “second best.” Gold journals can be free (that is diamond); green costs the author nothing at all. The fee — the Article Processing Charge, or APC — is a funding choice layered on top, not a property of the colour itself.

Gold, green, diamond & hybrid — one by one

Gold open access

In the gold model, the journal makes the final, peer-reviewed, published version of your article free to everyone, immediately, on its own website — normally under a Creative Commons licence. This is the version of record: the polished, typeset, citable article. Fully open-access journals are indexed and vetted in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), which lists over 20,000 journals from more than 130 countries and is the standard whitelist for checking that a gold journal is genuine. The catch some researchers hit is cost: many well-known gold journals fund themselves by charging the author an APC.

Green open access

Green OA is self-archiving. You publish in whatever journal you like — including a subscription one — and separately deposit a copy of your work in an open repository: your university’s institutional repository, or a subject repository or preprint server. The version you are usually allowed to post is the accepted manuscript (the peer-reviewed text, before the publisher’s typesetting), and publishers often impose an embargo — a delay of 6 to 24 months before the repository copy can go live. Green costs the author nothing, and every publisher’s specific rules are searchable in Sherpa Romeo, the standard database of journal self-archiving policies.

Green is the route almost no one uses — and almost everyone can

If your paper is already published behind a paywall, you may still be legally allowed to put the accepted manuscript in your university repository right now. Check the journal in Sherpa Romeo, confirm the embargo, and deposit. It is the cheapest open-access route in existence: it costs nothing but ten minutes.

Diamond (or platinum) open access

Diamond OA is gold’s more generous sibling: the journal is free to read and free to publish — no APC at all. The running costs are covered by a university, a learned society, a library consortium or a government, rather than by the author. This model quietly dominates the real world of open access: the 2021 OA Diamond Journals Study, commissioned by cOAlition S and Science Europe, estimated 17,000–29,000 such journals worldwide, and they are especially common across Africa, Latin America and Asia. For a Nigerian researcher without grant money for fees, diamond is often the ideal home. We cover it in depth in our dedicated guide to diamond open access.

Hybrid open access

A hybrid journal is a subscription journal that also offers, for a fee, to make your individual article open while the rest of the issue stays paywalled. It is the most contested model, because the publisher can be paid twice for the same journal — once through library subscriptions and again through your APC. Critics call this “double dipping.” Hybrid APCs are typically the highest of any route, and the major open-access funder alliance Plan S will not, as a rule, pay for standalone hybrid publishing. For a self-funding African author, hybrid is the route to approach with the most caution.

Bronze, and what is not open access

You will also meet bronze OA: an article that is free to read on the publisher’s site but carries no open licence. A large 2018 study in PeerJ found bronze was actually the most common form of free-to-read scholarship online. The problem is that “free today” is not “open”: with no licence, the publisher can move the article behind a paywall whenever it chooses, and your right to reuse or redistribute it is unclear. Treat bronze as a courtesy, not a guarantee.

Two things that look like open access but are not
  • Shadow libraries (Sci-Hub, and similar sites) distribute paywalled papers without permission. However tempting when you are locked out, this is copyright infringement, not open access — and none of the models above depend on it. Our guide to publishing openly for free shows the legitimate routes instead.
  • Predatory “open access” journals take your APC and publish anything with little or no peer review, trading on the OA label. Always verify a gold journal against DOAJ first — see our DOAJ vetting guide.

What it really costs — APCs & waivers

The Article Processing Charge (APC) is the fee some journals charge to publish your article openly. Its range is enormous: from zero at every diamond and green route, through a few hundred dollars at many mid-tier gold journals, up to headline figures like US$12,690 to publish open access in Nature. At the top end, a single APC can exceed a Nigerian academic’s monthly salary many times over — which is exactly why understanding the free routes matters so much here.

But the headline hides the good news, and it is worth stating plainly: most open-access journals charge no fee at all. Analyses of DOAJ consistently find that roughly two-thirds of its indexed journals levy no APC. The “open access means paying” assumption that puts so many African researchers off is simply not true of the majority of the field.

Three ways the fee disappears
  • Publish diamond. No fee is charged in the first place. Search DOAJ and filter for “without fees.”
  • Go green. Publish anywhere, then self-archive the accepted manuscript for free.
  • Claim a waiver. Many gold publishers waive or discount APCs for authors in lower-income countries, often through the Research4Life programme. Nigeria’s eligibility varies by publisher and can change, so confirm on the specific journal’s site before you submit.

Choosing your route as a Nigerian researcher

Put the theory to work. For most researchers publishing from Nigeria without a dedicated APC budget, the decision runs in this order.

Route 1 — first choice
Find a diamond journal in your field
Search DOAJ, filter to journals without publication fees, and check the subject fit. You publish the version of record, openly, at no cost. Confirm the journal is genuinely indexed — not a predatory look-alike.
Route 2 — if you have funding or a waiver
Publish gold, and ask about a waiver first
If the ideal journal is gold with an APC, check whether it offers a Research4Life or low-income-country waiver before submitting. Many do. Never assume the sticker price is the price you must pay.
Route 3 — always available as a backup
Publish anywhere, then go green
Whatever journal accepts your work, deposit the accepted manuscript in your institutional repository. Check the embargo in Sherpa Romeo and file it. This makes your research openly findable for free — and works even after a paywalled publication.
Route to avoid
Standalone hybrid, and anything unvetted
Hybrid APCs are the most expensive and hardest to justify on a tight budget. And any journal promising instant publication for a fee, with no DOAJ listing, should be treated as predatory until proven otherwise.

Identifiers, discovery & how FRELIP helps

Choosing an open-access model is one half of making your work count; making it findable and correctly credited is the other. That is where persistent identifiers come in. Whichever route you choose, pair your paper with a DOI so it stays citable, and link it to your ORCID iD so the credit lands with you. Open access decides who can read your work; identifiers decide who can find and attribute it.

Where FRELIP fits
  • Discovery. FRELIP indexes open scholarship across every one of these models — gold, green and diamond alike — so African research surfaces regardless of which road it took to openness.
  • Free access, legitimately. Our search brings together openly licensed papers, so you rarely need to hit a paywall in the first place. See how to find research papers for free, legally.
  • Practical guidance. This explainer is part of a FRELIP series on the working machinery of open research — models, identifiers, licences and discovery.

The takeaway is simple. Open access is a family, not a single door. Reach first for diamond, keep green in your back pocket for everything else, treat gold’s fees as negotiable through waivers, and be wary of hybrid. Do that, and your research reaches its readers — without a fee standing between you and the people your work is for.

FRELIP fact-check report

Every claim here was checked against primary sources: the Budapest Open Access Initiative, DOAJ, UNESCO, the OA Diamond Journals Study and the published OA literature. We separate what those sources confirm from what is reported but not fully settled.

Verified Confirmed by primary documentation
  • The founding OA definition — “free availability on the public internet” with rights to read, copy, distribute and link — comes from the Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002). (budapestopenaccessinitiative.org)
  • The gratis/libre and green/gold road distinctions are standard in the OA literature; the green/gold “roads” terminology traces to Stevan Harnad. (Suber, “Open Access”, MIT Press; Harnad)
  • Gold = journal publishes the version of record openly, often under a CC licence; DOAJ indexes 20,000+ vetted OA journals from 130+ countries. (doaj.org)
  • Green = author self-archives the accepted manuscript in a repository; embargoes and per-publisher rules are catalogued in Sherpa Romeo. (v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo)
  • Diamond = free to read and free to publish, funded by institutions/societies; the OA Diamond Journals Study (2021) estimated 17,000–29,000 such journals. (Science Europe / cOAlition S, “OA Diamond Journals Study”)
  • Hybrid = OA option inside a subscription journal; “double dipping” is the standard critique; Plan S does not, as a rule, fund standalone hybrid. (coalition-s.org)
  • Bronze = free to read without an open licence; a 2018 PeerJ study (Piwowar et al.) found it the largest free-to-read category. (Piwowar et al., PeerJ 2018)
  • Nature’s open-access APC is US$12,690. (nature.com — article-processing charges)
  • Roughly two-thirds of DOAJ-indexed journals charge no APC. (doaj.org; corroborated in the OA Diamond study)
  • Creative Commons licences (e.g. CC BY) are the standard tool for libre OA reuse rights. (creativecommons.org)
Hedged Reported but resting on changeable or secondary figures
  • The exact count of DOAJ journals and the precise share charging no APC shift over time; we give rounded figures (“20,000+”, “~two-thirds”) rather than a fixed number.
  • The 17,000–29,000 diamond-journal figure is a modelled estimate from a single (authoritative) 2021 study, not a live census.
  • APC waiver eligibility for Nigerian authors varies by publisher and by programme (Research4Life tiers change); we say “confirm on the journal’s site,” not “always available.”
  • Nature’s US$12,690 APC is current at publication but publisher fees are revised periodically; treat it as an order-of-magnitude ceiling, not a permanent number.
Excluded Claims we deliberately did not make
  • That open access implies lower quality or weaker peer review — false; OA is a distribution and funding model, independent of a journal’s peer-review rigour.
  • That shadow libraries such as Sci-Hub are a form of open access — they are not; we describe them as copyright infringement, outside every model here.
  • Any single “best” journal or blanket claim that a given publisher waives fees for all Nigerian authors — eligibility is specific and must be checked case by case.

Sources

Written and fact-checked by the FRELIP Editorial Team · Open Access & Research Practice.
This is an educational guide to open-access publishing models; it is not affiliated with or endorsed by DOAJ, cOAlition S, UNESCO or any publisher named. Spotted something to correct? Tell us.
📂 More Open Access & Research Practice explainers

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *