This week in law and society research, we review ten papers from leading open-access journals, with a strong focus on South African legal scholarship.
📊 This week at a glance
🌍 African-led research
Socio-economic rights litigation in South Africa often fails to improve the lives of poor women because it ignores their lived experiences.
The article argues that centring poor women’s experiences reveals the limits of using law for social change. This shifts the focus from abstract rights to the concrete conditions of poverty, disadvantage, and vulnerability to violence. For African scholars and policymakers, it means that legal victories must be evaluated by their actual impact on the ground, not just in courtrooms.
Section 27(1)(c) of South Africa’s Constitution provides a legal basis for a Basic Income Grant, moving the debate beyond economics.
The paper shows that the constitutional right to social security can justify a BIG, which changes the argument from pure feasibility to legal obligation. This implies that advocates can use constitutional law to push for implementation. For African policy, it highlights how domestic legal frameworks can anchor social welfare debates.
The Western Cape Commissioner for Children is a unique sub-national body with powers to protect child rights, but its impact depends on how it uses those powers.
The analysis details the establishment and duties of this only sub-national child rights institution in South Africa. It changes the understanding of how child rights are institutionalised beyond national level. For African scholarship, it offers a model for decentralised child rights protection.
Lawyers experience high rates of depression, anxiety, and burnout, with work environment playing a key role.
This study provides updated prevalence estimates and the first large multi-jurisdictional estimate of work-related burnout among lawyers. It confirms that distress is linked to practice environments, not just individual factors. For African legal education and practice, it signals the need for systemic mental health support.
Visually impaired employees in South Africa could access justice in workplace sexual offence cases if courts admit smell-based identification evidence.
The paper argues that current barriers exclude visually impaired persons from meaningful justice, despite CRPD protections. It proposes admitting evidence based on smell identification to improve access. For African legal systems, this challenges evidentiary norms to be more inclusive of disability.
Struggle songs like ‘Dubul’ ibhunu’ are not automatically hate speech, according to a South African court, but context matters.
The article analyses the AfriForum v Malema decision, which held that singing the song did not amount to hate speech. It reframes the debate around historical and political context, not just the lyrics. For African scholarship, it underscores the tension between freedom of expression and hate speech in post-colonial societies.
🔬 Global breakthroughs
The EU’s DSA Transparency Database has significant shortcomings that limit its usefulness for monitoring platform content moderation.
The empirical critique maps gaps in the database, such as incomplete or inconsistent data. It changes the assumption that transparency obligations automatically lead to accountability. For African researchers, it offers lessons for designing effective platform regulation.
Permitless concealed carry laws in the US are associated with an increase in violent crime.
The study estimates the causal impact of these laws, finding that they lead to more crime. This challenges the argument that loosening gun restrictions improves safety. For African policymakers, it provides evidence on the risks of deregulating firearm access.
Main path analysis can track the evolution of case law by identifying key judicial reasoning paths.
The paper introduces a method to automate the analysis of case law evolution, which is typically done manually. It changes how legal researchers can keep up with trends and consistency in judgments. For African legal systems, it offers a tool to manage growing case law efficiently.
Climate litigation relies on intuitive notions of climate justice, but philosophical standards could make legal reasoning more rigorous.
The normative inquiry argues that integrating moral standards into legal argumentation would strengthen climate litigation. It changes the view that legal and philosophical debates are separate. For African climate justice efforts, it suggests a framework to ground court arguments in ethical principles.
All papers are open access. Explore more Law research on FRELIP · discover open scholarship at frelip.org and search 36,000+ open works at search.frelip.org. FRELIP — born in Nigeria, built for African scholarship, serving the world.