This week’s digest spans law, governance, and policy, with a focus on African scholarship.
📊 This week at a glance
🌍 African-led research
South African courts should admit smell-based identification by visually impaired victims of workplace sexual assault to improve their access to justice.
The paper argues that current evidence rules exclude sensory identification methods like smell, which are crucial for visually impaired persons, despite international protections. This changes the understanding of ‘identification’ in criminal procedure, implying legal reforms to recognize non-visual evidence. For African jurisdictions, it highlights a concrete way to uphold disability rights in justice systems.
Struggle songs like ‘Dubul’ ibhunu’ are not automatically hate speech; context and history matter.
Analyzing the AfriForum v Malema ruling, the authors argue that the meaning of struggle songs depends on historical and social context, not just lyrics. This shifts the debate from a binary to a nuanced legal test. For South Africa, it informs how courts balance freedom of expression with hate speech prohibitions, especially in politically charged cases.
Māori co-governance in Aotearoa New Zealand often lacks real decision authority, but Ostrom’s principles can help diagnose and improve it.
The case study of Pare Hauraki shows that while participation is enhanced, power remains with Crown institutions. By applying Ostrom’s governance principles, the authors identify gaps in collective rights. This offers a diagnostic tool for African contexts where community-based natural resource management is promoted, ensuring that participation translates into actual authority.
South Africa’s public employment programmes should be seen as ‘support scaffolding’ for livelihoods, not just a bridge to formal jobs.
Based on the Presidential Employment Stimulus, the authors argue that in a constrained labour market, PEPs strengthen diverse livelihood portfolios rather than guarantee employment. This reframes policy expectations and evaluation. For African policymakers, it suggests designing PEPs to support multiple income streams, not just job creation.
Traditional civil liability rules are ill-equipped to handle medical malpractice involving AI, especially when AI systems are autonomous.
The paper examines how existing liability frameworks apply to AI in healthcare, such as surgical robots and diagnostic software. It highlights the challenge of assigning responsibility when AI acts independently. For African legal systems, this signals the need to update liability laws to address emerging AI technologies in medicine.
Nigeria’s estate administration suffers from probate delays and poor bank coordination, but lessons from common law and hybrid jurisdictions can help.
The study identifies fragmented oversight and limited digitisation as key problems in Nigeria’s estate management. By comparing with other jurisdictions, it suggests reforms like better coordination between probate registries and banks. For African countries, this offers practical steps to streamline inheritance processes and protect assets.
🔬 Global breakthroughs
Randomized trials on ultraprocessed foods are being overinterpreted; their evidence is not as strong as claimed.
This perspective reviews four trials and finds that their results are often extended beyond what the data support, especially regarding causal claims. This changes how nutrition research should be communicated. For African policymakers, it cautions against basing dietary guidelines on overstated evidence, emphasizing the need for rigorous interpretation.
The EU’s DSA Transparency Database has significant shortcomings that undermine its goal of platform accountability.
An empirical critique reveals gaps in the database’s completeness and reliability, limiting its use for research and oversight. This implies that transparency mechanisms need better design and enforcement. For African regulators considering similar laws, it offers lessons on avoiding pitfalls in content moderation transparency.
Permitless concealed carry laws have increased violent crime, according to a causal analysis.
Using statistical methods, the study finds that these laws, which allow carrying guns without a license, lead to higher crime rates. This challenges the notion that such laws improve public safety. For African nations debating gun control, it provides evidence that relaxing permit requirements may have adverse effects.
Climate litigation often lacks explicit reasoning about climate justice, but normative standards can be integrated into legal arguments.
The paper argues that courts rely on intuitive notions of climate justice without clear philosophical grounding. It proposes ways to incorporate moral standards into legal reasoning. For African courts hearing climate cases, this offers a framework to make decisions more principled and just.
All papers are open access. Explore more Law research on FRELIP · discover open scholarship at frelip.org and search 36,000+ open works at search.frelip.org. FRELIP — born in Nigeria, built for African scholarship, serving the world.