This week’s digest spans law, governance, and public policy, with a focus on African scholarship.
📊 This week at a glance
🌍 African-led research
South African courts should admit smell-based identification by visually impaired victims of workplace sexual assault to improve their access to justice.
The paper argues that current evidence rules exclude sensory testimony crucial for visually impaired persons, who are often assaulted by known colleagues. It proposes legal reforms to recognize olfactory identification, aligning with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. For African legal systems, this offers a concrete pathway to make justice more inclusive for disabled victims.
South African struggle songs like ‘Dubul’ ibhunu’ are not automatically hate speech; context and history matter.
Analyzing the AfriForum v Malema ruling, the authors argue that struggle songs must be assessed within their historical and political context, not in isolation. This challenges simplistic bans and provides a nuanced framework for balancing freedom of expression with hate speech prohibitions. For African democracies, it informs how courts can handle politically charged speech without erasing historical meaning.
Māori co-governance in Aotearoa New Zealand often fails to transfer real decision-making power, despite participatory rhetoric.
A case study of the Pare Hauraki redress process shows that Crown institutions retain authority, limiting Indigenous self-determination. Combining Ostrom’s principles with Indigenous governance offers a diagnostic to identify and rectify power imbalances. This is relevant for African nations designing co-management regimes for natural resources, ensuring that participation translates into actual control.
South Africa’s public employment programmes act as ‘support scaffolding’ for livelihoods, not just springboards to formal jobs.
Drawing on the Presidential Employment Stimulus, which created over 2.5 million opportunities, the authors argue that PEPs strengthen diverse livelihood portfolios in a constrained labour market. This reframing shifts policy evaluation from job placement to broader livelihood resilience. For African policymakers, it justifies PEPs as social protection tools, not temporary fixes.
Traditional civil liability rules are ill-equipped to assign responsibility for AI errors in healthcare, such as misdiagnosis or surgical mistakes.
The paper examines how intelligent systems in diagnosis and treatment complicate fault attribution, as AI’s ‘black box’ nature obscures causation. It calls for adapted legal frameworks to ensure patient compensation and accountability. For African health systems adopting AI, this highlights the need for clear liability standards to protect patients and guide innovation.
Nigeria’s estate administration suffers from probate delays and poor bank coordination, causing asset lock-up and disputes.
Comparing common law and hybrid jurisdictions, the authors identify fragmented oversight and limited digitisation as key bottlenecks. They recommend streamlined probate processes and better bank-registry collaboration. For African legal systems, this offers practical lessons to reduce delays and improve estate governance.
🔬 Global breakthroughs
Recent trials linking ultraprocessed foods to health harms often overstate causal claims beyond what the data support.
A review of four randomized controlled trials finds that interpretation frequently extends beyond evidence, due to methodological limits and reporting practices. This cautions against overhyped dietary warnings and urges more rigorous research. For African nutrition policy, it underscores the need for context-specific evidence before adopting global UPF narratives.
The EU’s DSA Transparency Database has significant shortcomings that undermine its goal of platform accountability.
An empirical critique reveals gaps in data completeness, accuracy, and usability, limiting the database’s effectiveness for researchers and regulators. The paper proposes concrete improvements, such as better data standards and enforcement. For African digital policy, it offers lessons on designing transparency mechanisms that actually work.
Permitless concealed carry laws in the US have not significantly increased violent crime, but effects on property crime vary.
Using state-level data, the study finds no robust causal impact on overall crime, though some specifications suggest increases in certain property crimes. This challenges both pro- and anti-gun narratives. For African nations debating firearm policies, it provides empirical evidence on the trade-offs of relaxed carry laws.
Climate litigation often lacks explicit reasoning on climate justice, relying on vague moral intuitions.
The authors argue that courts rarely articulate how justice principles inform their decisions, creating a normative gap. They propose a framework to integrate climate justice standards into legal reasoning. For African courts facing climate cases, this offers a tool to make judgments more principled and consistent.
All papers are open access. Explore more Law research on FRELIP · discover open scholarship at frelip.org and search 36,000+ open works at search.frelip.org. FRELIP — born in Nigeria, built for African scholarship, serving the world.